On the Value of Being Creative

I want to start this by openly stating that I’m not lamenting a long-lost past, where people were more creative than they are today. I’m not claiming that there is no creativity in anything that we do or that no one is being creative in how they solve issues or present information. But I am concerned about how everything feels the same, as if we can’t find it in ourselves to value different methods to convey a range of messages.

I’m worried that we too often focus on certain formats and structures while denigrating others, opting to deal with things that are easier and feel like we’re doing something more than we actually are. Though I enjoy a lot of the media that is produced by a variety of organisations and collectives, I occasionally fear that the creativity so many of them openly claim we need is being whittled away by their refusal to engage in and actively support initiatives that offer it.

In short, I feel like our collective failure to engage with a range of formats and structures in how we transmit and receive information is also negatively impacting our desire to engage with difficult ideas and complex issues that require a lot of nuance and don’t fit neatly into a binary (which is, to say, most issues). 

There’s no sound bite or summary that can adequately sum up everything, making it possible for us to engage with every perspective. For whatever reason, many people don’t want to engage with material that’s open-ended; they feel frustrated by something that broadly critiques and highlights problems with how things are but doesn’t offer concrete solutions or openly ends with someone saying they don’t know what the right response is at that moment.

Worse yet is if a bunch of people to whom an issue is actually relevant hold different opinions from each other on how to implement or support it, as has been the case of Land Back and Black Nationalism. When this happens, white people often try to play them against each other, supporting whomever has opinions that are the least harmful to the status quo. (And, for the record, the opinions of white ‘debate bro streamers’ on what either of these concepts mean are as irrelevant as they are uninformed.)

But this is more than just a media problem.

It’s really a much larger and broader problem of institutions, and it’s one that continues to prop up things like schools and academia. It’s one that continually, and wrongly, claims that qualifications are the only way to be an expert in something (unless you happen to be someone like Bill Gates, where it’s disgustingly excessive wealth that enables you to be an expert on whatever you claim to understand). It’s a problem that enables people to openly ignore the lived experiences of so many while they simultaneously latch onto the supposed “truth” that has been constructed from their chosen system of (usually colonial) knowledge.

This is all done to the detriment of marginalised and vulnerable people everywhere who only sometimes get crumbs and maybe superficial changes, if they get anything at all.


For so many of us, we’ve been indoctrinated into the belief that we need to have a singular answer that is immediately correct and functional and can be applied to every similar situation in order for change to happen. If it isn’t any of that, it’s inefficient or ineffective. And good luck if you willingly say that you don’t know what the answer is, that you just know there’s a problem we should address, because you will be hounded by people telling you that you’re doing nothing.

We falsely believe that there cannot be multiple responses or that some responses might not work for certain people or in certain places, even as they prove useful to someone else. We absurdly believe that we’re required to figure this shit out for ourselves and on our own, shrinking us into atomised enclaves of individuals who are unable to collaborate despite the loneliness and frustration we feel.

This doesn’t stop once you realise that it’s all nonsense or that someone else is engaging in those behaviours; it barely even stops once you recognise that you are also the one doing it because sometimes it’s hard to spot how your own behaviour and beliefs feed into harmful processes. It doesn’t stop because we’re all still required, to varying degrees, to work within systems that perpetuate these structures and punish us for acting outside of them whenever we try to do something different.

And I want to be clear here: This is not a problem of left versus right. This is a problem that exists across and throughout the entire political spectrum; this is a problem of having our lives so written out for us by the state (or by those who would seek to control us) that we only look for solutions within the narrow framework we’ve been allowed to access. 

We’ve been punished from the very beginning, from the moment we step into a school and then throughout our entire life, for not being able to achieve the ‘correct’ answer or for not getting to the ‘correct’ answer through the ‘most efficient’ and prescribed methods. Even when we tried to find workarounds that would enable us to continue participating in the system, we have been excessively punished and excluded.

We have been taught from a very early age that every problem has an immediate and obvious solution and that we are failures if we cannot find it. We have been taught that, when we highlight a problem without providing a solution, it is nothing more than complaining for the sake of complaining.

Our whole lives, we have been punished for trying to collaborate, for trying to be creative.


So I’m worried that we’re willingly neglecting and losing our capacity to be creative. It infuriates me that so many are happy to default to traditional methods of learning and knowing, those that many of us are familiar with because that’s what the state pushed us into, because there “is no other way to ensure everyone is educated.” (Except that’s a lie, and the entirety of human history prior to schooling shows otherwise.)

It’s nonsensical for people to pretend that they are always certain of what the answer should be to everything, mocking suggestions that appear “too utopian” or “too naive” without ever considering any part of them as viable.

It’s beyond absurd how often these people refuse to listen to those of us who have, in a broad range of ways, been abused as we were put through violent systems. Honestly, it really bothers me that so many of us are relying on using the same strategies and tactics of those who would seek to harm us just to push for them to even “acknowledge” our humanity, and it’s absolutely ridiculous that so many people continue to believe that they can enact much needed change that our world needs to see through the same systems that seek to oppress us.

That’s impossible.

Yet, what really frightens me about losing our creativity is that so many people across the political spectrum think that coercion of any sort is okay, some of whom claim that they endured it and “turned out fine” (they didn’t). It’s beyond my own understanding as to how so many people are fine with maintaining such an atomised existence, how they see the systems we have, systems that don’t work, and are only capable of the binary decision to either “reform them” or “keep them.” 

They can’t be bothered to believe there are so many more solutions available to us, if only we’d give some of them a chance.

If only we were curious and creative enough to explore something other than what we currently know.

And if only we were more willing to reflect upon ourselves.